Views and opinions

  • Печать

GOOD

  • Organization / Sessions rhythm / Content scientific & technical / Length of conference / One-session conference / Outing / Social events
  • The organization of the workshop was really good. Accommodation and transportation were highly simplified thanks to all the students. The workshop was very interesting and I saw a high level of quality in numerous talks
  • Organization, hospitality
  • The perfect organization, as usual! The warm welcome by Russian people (receptions, excursions). The Olymp hotel is perfect (rooms, lunches, swimming pool…). The single-session workshop
  • Excellent organization and location
  • The composition of talks (balances in algorithm, implementation, application) is good. The talks are of good quality
  • Very good organization, as it was 2 years ago. Thanks to the students who help us during the conference and thanks to Tatiana! 
  • There was good distribution of physics and computational methods, papers devoted to the fundamental issues of jet noise and in applications to jet noise, airframe noise. The workshop provides a forum for interaction among international colleagues.
  • Selection of talks and events. Perfect organization!
  • Organization. Size (optimal). Technical content. The location
  • Invited lectures
  • The workshop has been superbly well organized, and I have nothing but praise for the whole event. Thank you!
  • Organization of this conference. A lot of sightseeings

  NOT SO GOOD AND COULD BE IMPROVED

  • Cell phones should be put to vibrate mode. Participants should refrain from taking many pictures or systematic video taping the presentations
  • Transportation from Paris to Kaliningrad is not very good (not a lot of flights). Road from the airport to Svetlogorsk was improved, a good part. It would be nice to organize another dinner during the Workshop
  • The weather on Wednesday and Thursday! (Joke!) 20 min per talk is short (30 min at AIAA) -> go to 25 min?
  • No complaints 
  • No lavatories / No participants
  • A slightly more internation participation would improve interaction among participants.
  • Shorten the conference duration (max 3 days) 
  • Visa

 OPINIONS

  • Side organization of relevant project meetings in order to attract participants
  • It could be a good idea to propose other Russian cities to organize the meeting. How about the organization of a more general meeting on aeroacoustics (not only CFD) to have our own “AIAA” in Europe?
  • When the workshop will grow (it will!) with non-Russian attendants, do not stick to Svetlogorsk: very nice place, but people may want to go elsewhere after 2 or 3 visits to Svetlogorsk. There are certainly hundred of nice places in Russia (even excluding Moscow and St-Petersburg)
  • Continue to bring international colleagues, industry, also ask TsAGI and other Russian organizations to have review of their research projects
  • Stronger emphasis on using CAA experiments on obtaining the physics and insight of the physical problem
  • More presentations on experiments!
  • I very much hope the series will continue. I think Svetlogorsk is a very good location